As criticism of Instagram, TikTok, and X intensifies within the EU, developers have been creating European social media applications. But can they hold their own? DW addresses the essential queries.
Instagram and Facebook by Meta, X (previously Twitter) from Elon Musk, TikTok owned by ByteDance — billions of social media users engage with these platforms on a daily basis.
These and other tech companies have grown massive and influential. However, in recent years, the European Union has made significant strides to curb their impact. DW provides the key questions and answers.
Why has Big Tech faced backlash?
Large firms like Meta or ByteDance hold immense market power — 3 billion Instagram users and nearly 2 billion TikTok users speak for themselves. Their reach goes beyond market control, as the platforms’ algorithms help shape which information reaches us first and, to a degree, how we view the world through the social media lens.
But detractors argue that these platforms fail to adequately address fake news, encourage division, emphasize extreme content in their algorithms, and neglect data protection — for instance, regarding personalized ads and training their respective in-house artificial intelligence.
Social media bans: What it means for you
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
In Europe, several nations are considering a social media prohibition for young people; Australia already introduced one last December.
For many years, the European Union has clashed with social media platforms over their content moderation policies, including Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook. Numerous users and advertisers abandoned Twitter after it was acquired by South African billionaire Elon Musk and subsequently rebranded as X in 2023.
The Chinese TikTok platform has faced accusations of ties to the Chinese government and the Communist Party, including worries about censorship. Additionally, European security agencies have cautioned that TikTok, or ByteDance, stores data to an undisclosed degree. If so, and for what purpose geopolitical rival China would utilize that data, remains unclear.
Are there European social media alternatives?
Alternatives to Instagram, X, and TikTok from Europe already exist: the Mastodon platform from Germany is considered the most well-known. France has introduced PeerTube, created by the nonprofit Framasoft, as a substitute for YouTube, which is owned by Google parent company Alphabet.
The BeReal app, also from France, experienced a brief spike in popularity in 2022. The concept permits users to post just one image per day, at a random time, and that image cannot be edited. The goal is to reduce addictive potential.
Dutch network Eurosky, a platform for accessing independent social networks, stores data in a decentralized manner and in compliance with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation.
W Social from Sweden is a less data-intensive alternative to X launched on May 9 — Europe Day — in response to platforms increasingly overwhelmed by AI bots. According to its own description, W Social is a social network “governed by EU law, data hosted in Europe, and built for real, verified people.”
“In key security policy areas, authorities in European countries should only use products that are not subject to control or access of non-European governments,” said Katharina Dröge, parliamentary leader for the Greens in Germany’s parliament.
Supporting that stance, Henna Virkkunen, vice-president of the European Commission responsible for tech sovereignty, has maintained a Mastodon account since June 2025.
What do European platforms do differently?
The example of the X alternative Mastodon clearly highlights the distinctions from the large non-European platforms: the network operates in a decentralized fashion, and data is not stored on a single server but on various computers run by private individuals or institutions. Mastodon uses the decentralized protocol ActivityPub, managed by the World Wide Web Consortium led by Tim Berners-Lee, the web’s inventor.
Mastodon is part of the Fediverse, a collection of various independent, primarily Europe-based networks, including PeerTube. Fediverse platforms rely on open-source software, making them more cost-effective and transparent than their US counterparts.
When programming their algorithms, the providers avoid endless recommendation feeds and prioritization of extreme content, which mainly helps protect minors and prevent addiction.
Austria sends 70,000 kids on a three‑week smartphone detox
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
What are the drawbacks of European social media providers?
Every social medium derives its appeal from having a large number of users, with users and advertisers generating reach and visibility. And that’s where the Europeans’ main drawback lies: all of them are, so far, too small to achieve global significance.
The primary issues compared to major providers are the complicated setup and user interface. “You have some convincing to do, because those alternatives are not well known. And it’s possible that the applications just don’t look exactly the way you’re used to,” Jochim Selzer of Germany’s Chaos Computer Club, one of Europe’s largest hacker associations, told German press service epd. Switching to other applications can involve a “certain adjustment period.”
Mastodon now has roughly 10 million registered accounts and around 1 million active users per month, while the video platforms under the PeerTube umbrella host about 1 million videos, already making them European “giants.”
But for now, there is no indication that Europe’s alternatives will surpass their American or Chinese rivals.
This article was originally written in German.